Modern Cognitive Warfare: From the Application of Cognitive Science and Technology in the Battlefield to the Arena of Cognitive Warfare

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Associate Prof., Shahid Sattari Aeronautical University of Science and Technology, Tehran, Iran.

2 Faculty of Educational Sciences and Psychology, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran.

Abstract

Background & Purpose: Revolutionary advances in cognitive science and technology have led mind-brain studies to the novel “brain control and simulation” phase. The development of cognitive science and technology, along with the huge investment of the world’s leading military research institutes in this area, suggest the emergence of a new arena of warfare, which is known as “cognitive warfare”. The present study aims to conduct a logical and conceptual analysis of cognitive warfare and illustrate its conceptual network.
Methodology: The study is performed using logical and conceptual analyses. The applied techniques include constructive, detective, and reductive analyses.
Findings: The analyses indicate six common logical fallacies in the conceptualization of cognitive warfare: the reduction of cognitive warfare to the psychological level, the reduction of cognitive warfare to cognitive operations, the reduction of  cognitive influence to cognitive interference, the reduction of  cognitive warfare to cognitive impairment, the reduction of  cognitive warfare to military operations, and the reduction of  cognitive warfare to application of cognitive science and technology in the battlefield. Each of the mentioned fallacies represents a natural element of cognitive warfare to demonstrate its conceptual network: cognitive warfare science and technology, cognitive warfare based on cognitive theories, the effectiveness of cognitive warfare, cognitive warfare dimensions, the scope of cognitive warfare, and the arena of cognitive warfare.
Conclusion: The renaissance of cognitive science and technology highlights the fact that future power and supremacy lies in cognitive superiority and empowerment in the arena of cognitive warfare. Thus, some of the critical measures to be taken in this regard are establishing cognitive science and technology research centers, cognitive defense centers, and cognitive battlefield bases and headquarters. Other essential actions include the training of officers for cognitive warfare, policymaking, legislation, and executive measures and planning for offence and defense in the arena of cognitive warfare

Keywords

References

Anderson, E. (2019). Learning to learn. Harvard Business Review special issue: How to learn faster and better.
Anderson, J. R. (1983). The Architecture of Cognition. USA: Harvard University, Cambridge.
Bergan, B. (2021). Real-Life Mind-Control Technologies. Retrieved from interesting engineering website: https://interestingengineering.com/mind-control-technologies-bci-brainstorms-governments-nanoparticles
Bigler, E.D. (2016). Systems biology, neuroimaging, neuropsychology, neuroconnectivity and traumatic brain injury. System Neurosciences, 10, 55.
Buncker, R.G. (1996). The Transition to Forth Epoch War. Marine Corps, Cazette.
Bunker, R.G. (1996). Advanced Battle Space and Cyber maneuver Concepts: Implication for Force XXI, “Paramaters.
Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff. (2017). Joint planning, Joint Publications 5-0. Washington, DC: Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff.
Chan, P., Ho, K., Ryan, AF. (2016). Impulse noise injury model. Mil Med, 181, 59-69.
Creveld, M.V. (1991). The Transformation of War. the Free Press, 1991, p. 73.
Curlee, J. (2020). Securing US vital interests in the competition with China in space. Washington.
DARPA. (2019). Six Paths to the Nonsurgical Future of Brain-Machine Interfaces. https://www.darpa.mil/news-events/2019-05-20
Dayan, P. & Abbott, L. F. (2001). Theoretical Neuroscience: Computational and Mathematical Modeling of Neural Systems. Cambridge: MIT Press.
du Cluzel, F. (2021). Behind NATO’s ‘cognitive warfare’: ‘Battle for your brain’ waged by Western militaries. Retrieved October 13, 2021, from: ttps://mronline.org/2021/10/13/ behind-natos-cognitive-warfare-battle-for-your-brain-waged-by-western-militaries
Eagly, A. & Chaiken, S. (1984). Cognitive Theories of Persuasion. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, (17), 267-359.
Fitzgerald, M.C. (1994). The Russian Military’s Strategy for Sixth Generation Warfare.
Forstmann, B. U., Wagenmakers, E.J., Eichele, T., Brown, S. & Serences, J. T. (2011). Reciprocal relations between cognitive neuroscience and formal cognitive models: opposites attract? Trends Cognition, 15, 272–279.
Galotti, K.M. (2008). Cognitive Psychology: Perception, Attention, and Memory. London: Cengage.
Griffiths, T. L., Lieder, F. & Goodman, N. D. (2015). Rational use of cognitive resources: levels of analysis between the computational and the algorithmic. Top Cognition, 7, 217–229.
Gross, T. (2019).  The CIA's Secret Quest For Mind Control: Torture, LSD And A 'Poisoner In Chief. MAY 3, 22: https://www.npr.org/2019/09/09/758989641/the-cias-secret-quest-for-mind-control-torture-lsd-and-a-poisoner-in-chief.
Hargrove, L.J., Young, A.J., Simon, A.M.,  Fey, N.P., Lipschutz, R.D., Finucane, S.B., Halsne, E.G., Ingraham, K.A. & Kuiken, T.A. (2015). Intuitive control of a powered prosthetic leg during ambulation: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA, 313(22), 2244-2252.
Hassabis, D., Kumaran, D., Summerfield, C. & Botvinick, M. (2017). Neuroscience inspired artificial intelligence. Neuron, 95, 245–258.
Hillson, R. (2009). The DIME/PMESII Model Suite Requirements Project. NRL Review, 235–239.
Hunt, R. R. & Ellis, H.C. (2006). Fundamentals of Cognitive Psychology. New Delhi: Tata McGraw Hill.
Institute of International Political and Economic Strategies (2021). Cognitive warfare: war of a new generation. 24 Dec 2021: https://russtrat.ru/en/analytics_/24-december-2021-2228-7813
Jin, H., Hou, L.J., Wang, Zh.G. (2018). Military Brain Science - How to influence future wars. Chinese Journal of Traumatology, 21, 277-280.
Jones, R. (2021). Researcher finds a better way to tap into the brain. Retrieved from university of Miami: https://news.miami.edu/stories/2021/03/researcher-finds-a-better-way-to-tap-into-the-brain.html.
Jung, Y., Kwak, J.H., Kang, H., Kim, W.D., Hur, S. (2015). Mechanical and electrical characterization of piezoelectric artificial cochlear device and biocompatible packaging. Sensors (Basel), 15(8), 18851-18864.
Kania, E. (2019). Minds at war: chinas pursuit of military advantage through cognitive science and biotechnology. P R I S M, 3, 83-101.
Karp, A. (2020). Watch CNBC’s full Interview with Palantir CEO Alex Karp at Davos. Retrieve from:  https://www.cnbc.com/video/2022/09/22/watch-cnbcs-full-interview-with-palantir-ceo-alex-karp.html
Kay, K. N., Naselaris, T., Prenger, R. J. & Gallant, J. L. (2008). Identifying natural images from human brain activity. Nature, 452, 352–355.
Keegan, J. (1994). A History of Warfare, PP. 98-101.
Kellogg, R.T. (2007). Cognitive Psychology. London: Sage Publications.
Kellogg, R.T. (2007). Cognitive Psychology. London: Sage Publications.
Kelly, K. (2010). What technology wants. New York: Penguin Books.
Kelly, K. (2016). The inevitable. New York: Viking Press.
Kosterec, M. (2016). Methods of Conceptual Analysis. Journal of Filozofia, 71(3), 220-230.
Krepinevich. (1994). Cavalry to Computer: The Pattern of Military Revolution. The National Interest, (37), 30-42.
Kriegeskorte, N. & Mok, R. M. (2017). Building machines that adapt and compute like brains. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 40, 269. DOI:10.1017/S0140525X17000188
Lake, B. M., Ullman, T. D., Tenenbaum, J. B. & Gershman, S. J. (2017). Building machines that learn and think like people. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 40, 253.
Ljungqvist, J., Zetterberg, H., Mitsis, M., Blennow, K., Skoglund, T. (2017). Serum neurofilament light protein as a marker for diffuse axonal injury: results from a case series study. Neuro trauma, 34(5), 1124- 1127.
Marblestone, A. H., Wayne, G. & Kording, K. P. (2016). Towards an integration of deep learning and neuroscience. Computational Neuroscience, 10, 94.
McClelland, J. L. & Rumelhart, D. E. (1987). Parallel Distributed Processing. USA: MIT Press, Cambridge.
NASA. (2020). Explore moon to mars. Retrieved February 2, 2020, from NASA: https://www. nasa.gov/topics/moon-to-mars/lunar-gateway
Newsome, M.R., Mayer, A.R., Lin, X., Troyanskaya, M., Jackson, G.R., Scheibel, R.S., Walder, A., Sathiyaraj, A., Wilde, E.A., Mukhi, S., Taylor, B.A. & Levin, H.S. (2016). Chronic effects of blast-related TBI on subcortical functional connectivity in veterans. Neuropsychology, 22, 631-642.
Norton, B. (2021). Behind NATO’s ‘cognitive warfare’: ‘Battle for your brain’ waged by Western militaries. Retrieved October 13, 2021, from: ttps://mronline.org/2021/10/13/ behind-natos-cognitive-warfare-battle-for-your-brain-waged-by-western-militaries/.
Reed, S.K. (2010). Cognition: Theories and Applications. London: Cengage.
Rezai, A.R., Sederberg, P.B., Bogner, J., Nielson, D.M., Zhang, J., Mysiw, W.J., Knopp, M.V. & Corrigan, J.D. (2016). Improved function after deep brain stimulation for chronic, severe traumatic brain injury. Neurosurgery, 79(2), 204-211.
Roco, M.C. & Bainbridge, W.S. (2003). Converging technologies for improving human performance: Nanotechnology, Biotechnology, Information Technology, and Cognitive Science (NBIC). DOI:10.1007/978-94-017-0359-8
US Space Force. (2019). Fact sheet. Retrieved February 2, 2020, from United States Space Force: https://www.spaceforce.mil/About-Us/Fact-Sheet
Weber, J. T. (2016). Deception: neurological foundations, cognitive processes, and practical forensic applications. Modern Psychological Studies, (22)1, 64-71.
Zerubavel, E. (2019). The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Sociology. Edited by Wayne H. Brekhus and Gabe Ignatow. New York: Oxford University Press.
Journal of Human Resource Management
Volume 12, Issue 2
June 2022
Pages 156-180

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 19 May 2022
  • Revise Date: 02 August 2022
  • Accept Date: 12 August 2022

Share

How to cite

Statistics