Journal of Human Resource Management

Journal of Human Resource Management

Representation of Factors Affecting the Formation of Unethical Pro-organizational Behaviors in the Academic Context

Document Type : Original Article

Authors
Zohreh Kolivandzadeh 1
Mohsen Nazarzadeh Zare 2
1 MSc. Student, Department of Educational Sciences, Faculty of Literature and Humanities, Malayer University, Malayer, Iran.
2 Assistant Prof., Department of Educational Sciences, Faculty of Literature and Humanities, Malayer University, Malayer, Iran.
10.22034/jhrs.2023.172973
Abstract
Background & Purpose: Unethical pro-organizational behaviors as actions for the organization's or its members' interests, despite violating social, and moral values, laws, or behavioral standards. Undoubtedly, behind every unethical pro-organizational behavior a motive or motives that caused such behavior to appear in the interests of the organization or its members. Hence, the main aim of the present study was to identify the factors influencing the formation of unethical pro-organizational behaviors in the academic context.
Methodology: To achieve this purpose, an exploratory sequential mixed approach was used. In the qualitative phase, we used a phenomenological method to extract the factors influencing the formation of unethical pro-organizational behaviors. Hence, 22 experts were selected using the quota sampling method. The tool used to collect data were a semi-structured interview and the seven-step process of Colaizzi. In the quantitative phase, the classical Delphi technique was used to credit the extracted factors. In this technique, a questionnaire was designed based on the extracted factors in the qualitative phase and distributed among 12 experts, to obtain their consensus about the extracted factors. The quantitative data were also analyzed using statistical methods such as Kendall’s coefficient of concordance, measures of central tendency, and dispersion in SPSS software.
Findings: The findings obtained from the qualitative and quantitative phases showed that the experts had reached a consensus on the eight important factors of the formation of unethical pro-organizational behaviors in the academic context which included organizational etiquette, organizational structure, managerial approach, lack of academic autonomy, party and political exchanges, legal weakness, personal opportunism and parochialism, and thinking limitation.
Conclusion: The general conclusion of this study showed that in the academic context, compared to the context of other governmental and non-governmental organizations, individual, organizational, and environmental factors play an effective role in the formation of unethical pro-organizational behaviors. Hence, holding knowledge-building workshops to raise the awareness of the organization's individuals about unethical pro-organizational behaviors in the academic context. Strengthening the culture of transparency around the consequences of unethical pro-organizational behaviors in the academic context and accurately identifying unethical pro-organizational behaviors in the regulations and internal rules of a university should be considered by the top of a university.
Keywords
Academic context
Unethical behavior
Unethical pro-organizational behaviors
Abbaspour, H., Seyyed Naghavi, M. A., Abedijafari, H., Rasouli Ghahroudi, M. & Mehryar, A. H. (2020). Designing Unethical Pro-Organizational Behaviour Model in Public Companies. Organizational Behaviour Studies Quarterly, 9(2), 189-218. (in Persian)
Aghatabar Roudbari, J., Agha Mirzaei, T., Barimani, K. & Yousefi Saeedabadi, R. (2017). The Study of Academic Independence Gap Based on University Experts (The Case of Babol University of Medical Sciences and Noushirvani Technical University). Educ Strategy Med Sci, 10 (5), 334-344. (in Persian‏)
Alagheband, A. (2022). Introduction to educational management (6th edition). Tehran: Virayesh. (in Persian‏)
Appelbaum, S. H., Iaconi, G. D. & Matousek, A. (2007). Positive and negative deviant workplace behaviors: causes, impacts, and solutions. Corporate Governance: The international journal of business in society,5 (7), 586-598.
Bryant, W. & Merritt, S.M. (2021). Unethical pro-organizational behavior and positive leader-employee relationship. Journal of Business Ethics, 168 (4), 777-793.
Burnett, E. A. (2017). Bad behavior with good intentions: The role of organizational climate in unethical pro-organizational behavior (Doctoral dissertation, Clemson University).
Castille, C. M., Buckner, J. E. & Thoroughgood, C. N. (2018). Prosocial citizens without a moral compass? Examining the relationship between Machiavellianism and unethical pro-organizational behavior. Journal of business ethics, 149(4), 919-930.
Chen, M., Chen, C. C. & Sheldon, O. J. (2016). Relaxing moral reasoning to win: How organizational identification relates to unethical pro-organizational behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 101(8), 1082.‏
Creswell, J.W. (2009). Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (3rd Edition). Los Angeles: SAGE Publications.
Del Aram, M. (2013). The basics of promoting professional ethics in the university. National Medical Science Education Conference, Yazd, May 9-11, 2013, Shahid Sadougi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd. (in Persian‏)
Eimer, F. & Garkeaz, M. (2018). Slippery Slope or Compensatory Behavior: The Role of Locas of Control and Negative Affect on Ethical Accounting Decision Making. Journal of Value and Behavioral Accounting, 2 (4), 123-152. (in Persian‏)
Emani Lilabadi, A., Shahsafi, H. & Tajabadi, H. (2017). Principles of organizational ethics in Islam. Journal of Human Resource Management, 7(3), 141-164. (in Persian‏)
Graham, K. A., Resick, C. J., Margolis, J. A., Shao, P., Hargis, M. B. & Kiker, J. D. (2020). Egoistic norms, organizational identification, and the perceived ethicality of unethical pro-organizational behavior: A moral maturation perspective. Human Relations, 73(9), 1249-1277.‏
Habibi, A., Sarafrazi, A. & Izadyar, S. (2014). Delphi technique theoretical framework in qualitative research. The International Journal of Engineering and Science, 3(4), 8-13.
Hosseini, Z., Mortazavi, S., Rahimnia, F. & Nazemi, S. (2018). Identifying the reasons of Unethical Pro-Organizational Behaviors occurrence in governmental organizations. Public Organizations Management, 6(4), 57-70. (in Persian‏)
Javdani, H., Tofighi, J., Ghazi Tabatabaee, M., Pardakhtchi, M.H. (2008). Managerial Subsystem in Iranian Higher Education: Past, Present and Future. IRPHE, 14 (2),139-161. (in Persian‏)
Jiang, W., Liang, B. & Wang, L. (2022). The Double-Edged Sword Effect of Unethical Pro-organizational Behavior: The Relationship between Unethical Pro-organizational Behavior, Organizational Citizenship Behavior, and Work Effort. Journal of Business Ethics, 1-14.
Kaptein, M. (2011). Understanding unethical behavior by unraveling ethical culture. Human Relations, 64(6), 843-869.
Khorsand, S., Janalizadeh Choobbasti, H. & Razeghi, N. (2022). Scientific Freedom in the Academic Environment: Challenges, Strategies, and Consequences. Strategic Research on Social Problems in Iran, 11(1), 1-32. (in Persian‏)
Kish-Gephart, J. J., Harrison, D. A. & Treviño, L. K. (2010). Bad apples, bad cases, and bad barrels: meta-analytic evidence about sources of unethical decisions at work. Journal of applied psychology, 95(1), 1-9.
Lee, A., Schwarz, G., Newman, A. & Legood, A. (2019). Investigating when and why psychological entitlement predicts unethical pro-organizational behavior. Journal of Business Ethics, 154(1), 109-126.
Lian, H., Huai, M., Farh, J. L., Huang, J. C., Lee, C. & Chao, M. M. (2022). Leader unethical pro-organizational behavior and employee unethical conduct: Social learning of moral disengagement as a behavioral principle. Journal of Management, 48(2), 350-379.
Matherne, C. F. & Litchfield, S. R. (2012). Investigating the relationship between affective commitment and unethical pro-organizational behaviors: The role of moral identity. Journal of Leadership, Accountability, and Ethics, 9(5), 35-46.
Mertens, D. M. & Wilson, A. T. (2019), Program Evaluation Theory and Practice: A Comprehensive Guide (Second Edition). New York: The Guilford Press.
Mohammadi, H. (2021). A Thematic Analysis of the Ethical Behavior of Public Agents Based on the Second Chapter of Sa'di's Golestan. Journal of Human Resource Management, 11(3), 147-169. (in Persian‏)
Nasirzadeh, F. (2014). The impact of management ethics and moral consciousness and intelligence agencies. Quarterly Scientific Journal of Applied Ethics Studies, 10(38), 103-125. (in Persian‏)
Naude, I. (2004). Factors impacting on ethical behaviour in organisations (Doctoral dissertation, University of Pretoria).
Ning, N., & Zhaoyi, L. (2017). Psychological contract breach, organizational disidentification, and employees’ unethical behavior: Organizational ethical climate as moderator. Social Behavior and Personality: an international journal, 45 (9), 1409-1424.
Nouri, A.& Mohammadi, Y. (2015). A practical guide to research in the humanities. Tehran: Virayesh. (in Persian‏)
Pourdadashi, A., Maetofi, A., Abbasi, E. & Garkaz, M. (2020). The Development of a Conceptual Model for Auditors’ Unethical Pro-Organization Motivations and Behaviors Based on Data Grounded Theory. Financial Accounting Knowledge, 7(2), 63-84.
(in Persian‏)
Rahimi, H. (2017). Analysis of the relationship between organizational culture and ethical behavior of employees of Kashan University. Quarterly Scientific Journal of Applied Ethics Studies, 13(49), 91-117. (in Persian‏)
Rahimi, S., Aarabi, S. & Fayazi, B. M. (2020). The Typology of Organizational Behavior Strategy. Strategic Management Researches, 25(75), 45-70. (in Persian‏)
Shosha, G. (2012). Employment of Colaizzi's strategy in descriptive phenomenology: A reflection of a researcher. European Science Journal, 8(27), 31- 43.
Tavalaee, R. (2010). Factors Influencing the Ethical Conduct of Personnel in Organization. Police Organizational Development, 6(25), 45-64. (in Persian‏)
Tsiavia, N. (2016). Unethical pro-organizational behavior (UPB): Concept and studies evolution. Science Journal of Business and Management, 4 (2), 34-41.
Umphress, E.E. & Bingham, J.B. (2011). When employees do bad things for good reasons: Examining unethical pro-organizational behaviors. Organization Science, 22 (3), 621–640.
Umphress, E.E., Bingham, J.B. & Mitchell, M.S. (2010). Unethical behavior in the name of the company: The moderating effect of organizational identification and positive reciprocity beliefs on unethical pro-organizational behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95 (4), 769.
Uymaz, A. O. & Arslan, S. (2022). Unethical pro-organizational behavior as an outcome of servant leadership. Journal of Management & Organization, 28(1), 33-57.
Vem, L. J., Cheah, J. H., Ng, S. I. & Ho, J. A. (2022). Unethical pro-organizational behavior: how employee ethical ideology and unethical organizational culture contribute. International Journal of Manpower, (ahead-of-print).‏
Wang, D., Weng, Q., Kiani, A. & Ali, A. (2022). Job insecurity and unethical pro-organizational behavior: The joint moderating effects of moral identity and proactive personality. Personality and Individual Differences, 195, 111685.‏
Xu, L. & Wang, J. (2020). Influence of Challenge–Hindrance Stressors on Unethical Pro-Organizational Behavior: Mediating Role of Emotions. Sustainability, 12(18), 7576.‏
Yarmohamedzadeh, P., Enayati, B., Zahrai, Shorei Milani, Z. (2020). Analysis of the Relationship between Personal Values and Immoral Behavior with Commitment to Organizational Change. Ethics in Science and Technology, 15 (2),63-69. (in Persian‏)
Zhang, C. & Xiao, X. (2020). Review of the influencing factors of unethical pro-organizational behavior. Journal of Human Resource and Sustainability Studies, 8 (01), 35.
Zhang, X., Liang, L., Tian, G. & Tian, Y. (2020). Heroes or villains? The dark side of charismatic leadership and unethical pro-organizational behavior. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(15), 5546.‏
Zhi, Z., Xiaoyu, W., Xiaoyu, J. & Zhanjie, L. (2022). The Impact of Emotional Labor on Unethical Pro-organizational Behavior of Medical Staff: Taking Organizational Identification as an Intermediary. Psychology and Behavioral Sciences. 11 (1), 29-36.
Journal of Human Resource Management
Volume 13, Issue 1
Winter 2023
Pages 109-130

  • Receive Date 18 March 2023
  • Revise Date 02 May 2023
  • Accept Date 22 May 2023